Mediation Strategies in L2 Learning from Sociocultural Perspective:  A Comparative Analysis of Empirical Studies

Authors

  • Siyu Deng Shandong University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17836531

Keywords:

second language acquisition, mediation strategies, sociocultural theory, L2 learning

Abstract

This paper evaluates the role of mediation strategies in second language learning (L2 learning), through analyzing two empirical studies about L2 learning. Both studies align with Sociocultural Theory’s core tenet that L2 development originates from socially mediated interactions. The comparative analysis reveals three key commonalities in mediation strategies: mediation serves as a critical bridge transforming external social interactions; effective mediation adheres to the “Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)-aligned” principle, with strategies tailored to learners’ current L2 proficiency; mediation is a multi-agent system involving teachers, peers, tools, and learners themselves, rather than a teacher-centric process. Nonetheless, the two studies diverge in core goals, mediator roles, strategy implementation, adaptation to learners,and learner’s responses to linguistic contexts due to distinct sociolinguistic contexts and learner characteristics. According to the comparative analysis, three highly feasible mediation strategies for L2 learners are distilled: engaging in multi-agent interactive mediation, adopting ZPD-aligned context mediation, and practicing self-mediation for regulation. This study not only deepens the understanding of the mediating mechanism in L2 learning from the SCT perspective but also provides empirical references for designing adaptive mediation strategies in L2 teaching, improving teaching efficiency, as well as enhancing learner’s language proficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Jourmal, 78, 465-483.

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction.In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chen, L. (2021). Use of Language Learning Strategies among Learners of Chinese as a Second Language from the Perspective of Mediation Theory. [Master’s thesis, Hubei University of Technology]. 2021. https://doi.org/10.27131/d.cnki.ghugc.2021.000781

Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Gort, M, & Pontier, R.W. (2013). Exploring bilingual pedagogies in dual language preschool classrooms. Language and Education, 27, 223-245.

Han, Z., & Nassaji, H. (2019). Introduction: A snapshot of thirty-five years of instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776992

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B., & Holmes, J. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). Baltimore, USA: Penguin Education, Penguin Books Ltd.

Kohler, M.(2015). Teachers as mediators in the foreign language classroom. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Lantolf, J.P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Lantolf, J. P., & Beckett,T. (2009). Timeline: Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Language Teaching, 42, 1-19.

Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S. F. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the sociogenesis of second language development. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lyster, R., Saito, K, & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1-40.

Masuda, K., & Arnett, C. (2015). Cognitive linguistics, sociocultural theory and language teaching: Introduction. Cognitive Linguistics and Sociocultural Theory, 1-22. De Gruyter Mouton.

Negueruela-Azarola, E., & García, P. N. (2016). Sociocultural theory and the language classroom. The Routledge handbook of English language teaching,295-309. Routledge.

Ohta, A.S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom setting: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Saville-Troike , M. (1988). Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the “silent period.”Journal of Child Language, 15, 567-590.

Schwartz, M., & Gorbatt, N. (2017). “There is No Need for Translation: She Understands”: Teachers’ Mediation Strategies in a Bilingual Preschool Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 143–162.

https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12384

Vygotsky,L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Deng, S. (2025). Mediation Strategies in L2 Learning from Sociocultural Perspective:  A Comparative Analysis of Empirical Studies. Global Academic Frontiers, 3(4), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17836531