A Study of the Impact of ESG on Corporate Carbon Performance -- Based on the mediating effect of New quality productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17018925Keywords:
ESG, Carbon performance, New quality productivity, Mediating effect, Moderating effectAbstract
To investigate whether corporate ESG can improve corporate carbon performance and facilitate the achievement of China's "dual-carbon" objective, we utilize panel data from China's A-share-listed companies spanning 2015 to 2022. We develop new quality productivity indicators through principal component analysis and empirically assess the impact and mechanisms of ESG on corporate carbon performance using bidirectional fixed-effects, mediated-effects, and moderated-effects models. The influence and mechanism of ESG on corporate carbon performance are experimentally analyzed utilizing a two-way fixed effects model, a mediation effects model, and a moderating effects model. Research indicates that (i) strong ESG performance can markedly enhance corporate carbon performance; this conclusion remains valid following various robustness and endogeneity assessments, including substituting core explanatory variables, lagging explanatory variables by one period, and augmenting the standard error of clustering at the city level. (ii) Mechanism analysis indicates that ESG performance enhances the carbon performance of firms both directly and indirectly by fostering advancements in new quality productivity. (iii) The examination of moderating effects indicates that company financialization enhances the favorable influence of ESG on corporate carbon performance. Heterogeneity study indicates that ESG exerts a more pronounced influence in the eastern area, among non-state-owned firms, and within non-heavily polluting enterprises. Consequently, to advance the low-carbon transformation of the economy, it is essential to stratify the policy design. Incentives for ESG can be enhanced for non-state-owned enterprises, manufacturing sectors, and the eastern region, while technology subsidies or differentiated assessment criteria are required for state-owned enterprises, heavily polluting industries, and the central and western regions to address the structural disparities in ESG practices and to encourage non-manufacturing industries to pursue synergistic avenues of digital transformation and ESG integration.
Downloads
References
Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2023). The real effects of ESG reporting and GRI standards on carbon mitigation: International evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 2985–3000.
Cong Y, Zhu C, Hou Y, Tian S and Cai X (2022) Does ESG investment reduce carbon emissions in China?. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:977049. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.977049
Chu, H., Niu, X., Li, M., & Wei, L. (2025). Research on the impact of new quality productivity on enterprise ESG performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, 99, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104009
Xie, Y. (2024). The impact of ESG performance on corporate sustainable growth from the perspective of carbon sentiment. Journal of Environmental Management, 367, 121913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121913
Lu, J., & Li, H. (2024). The impact of ESG ratings on low carbon investment: Evidence from renewable energy companies. Renewable Energy, 223, 119984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.119984
Geng, Y., Zheng, Z., Yuan, X., & Jiménez-Zarco, A. I. (2025). ESG performance and total factor productivity of enterprises: The role of digitization. Research in International Business and Finance, 77, 102920.
Xue, Q., Jin, Y., & Zhang, C. (2024). ESG rating results and corporate total factor productivity. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103381
Huang, R., Zhu, Z., Ruan, R., & Lou, X. (2024). Linking low-carbon practices with ESG performances: Exploration evidence from the configurational perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, 140532.
Lee, C. L., & Liang, J. (2024). The effect of carbon regulation initiatives on corporate ESG performance in real estate sector: International evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 453, 142188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142188
Yuan, Y., Dai, H., & Ma, J. (2025). The Impact of Corporate ESG Performance on Supply Chain Resilience: A Mediation Analysis Based on New Quality Productive Forces. Sustainability, 17(10), 4418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104418
Parris, T. M., & Kates, R. W. (2003). CHARACTERIZING AND MEASURING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28(Volume 28, 2003), 559-586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105551
Springett, D. (2003). Business conceptions of sustainable development: A perspective from critical theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.353
Lindgreen, A. and Swaen, V. (2010), Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00277.x
Lee, M.-D.P. (2008), A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10: 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x
Chan, E. Y. (2025). Moral Signaling in Startups: How ESG Claims Shape Stakeholder Judgments and Ethical Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-06039-0
Talan, G., Sharma, G. D., Pereira, V., & Muschert, G. W. (2024). From ESG to holistic value addition: Rethinking sustainable investment from the lens of stakeholder theory. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103530
Bafera, J., & Kleinert, S. (2022). Signaling Theory in Entrepreneurship Research: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(6), 2419-2464. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221138489
Fu, L., Boehe, D. M., & Orlitzky, M. O. (2021). Broad or Narrow Stakeholder Management? A Signaling Theory Perspective. Business & Society, 61(7), 1838-1880. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211053018
Lee, M. T., Raschke, R. L., & Krishen, A. S. (2022). Signaling green! Firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation. Journal of Business Research, 138, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.061
Fan Gao. (2023). The logic behind the proposal of “new quality productivity,” its multidimensional connotations, and its significance for the times. Review of Political Economy., 14 (06), 127-145.
Wen Zhou & Lingyun Xu. (2023). On New Quality Productivity: Its Characteristics and Key Focus Areas. Reform, (10), 1-13.
Zheng Xu, Linhao Zheng & Mengyao Cheng. (2023). The intrinsic logic and practical concepts of new quality productivity empowering high-quality development. Contemporary Economic Research, (11), 51-58.
Yu He, Qingliang Tang & Kaitian Wang. (2017). Carbon Performance and Financial Performance. Accounting Research, (02), 76-82+97.
Jia Song, Jinchang Zhang & Yi Pan. (2024). The Impact of ESG Development on Corporate New Quality Productivity: Empirical Evidence from Chinese A-Share Listed Companies. Contemporary Economic Management., 46 (06), 1-11. doi:10.13253/j.cnki.ddjjgl.2024.06.001.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data are available in specialized financial databases, processed by the authors.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ying Wu, Yu Liao, Dai-Yun Li (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
