Blockchain Electronic Bills of Lading in Cross-Border Trade: Development, Challenges, and Governance Responses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20605613Keywords:
blockchain electronic bill of lading, legal regulation, data security, financial regulationAbstract
With the sustained advancement of digital trade and the digital transformation of international shipping, blockchain electronic bills of lading, characterized by decentralization, immutability, traceability, and efficient circulation, have gradually become an important direction for the digital replacement of traditional paper bills of lading. However, the promotion of blockchain electronic bills of lading in cross-border trade still faces multiple practical obstacles. On the one hand, existing legal norms lack clear provisions on their legal nature, function as documents of title, and negotiability, resulting in insufficient institutional support. On the other hand, the transparency and multi-party data-sharing mechanism of blockchain have also brought risks such as the leakage of trade secrets, inadequate privacy protection, and difficulties in cross-border data governance. Meanwhile, the coexistence of real-time cross-border capital flows and reliance on intermediary platforms has posed challenges to traditional financial regulation, including delayed regulatory responses, insufficient rule coordination, and weak collaborative supervision. In light of this, coordinated efforts should be made in improving legal rules, strengthening data security governance, and enhancing cross-border financial regulatory cooperation, so as to promote the standardized application and sound development of blockchain electronic bills of lading in cross-border trade.
Downloads
References
Balci, G., & Surucu-Balci, E. (2021). Blockchain adoption in the maritime supply chain: Examining barriers and salient stakeholders in containerized international trade. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 156, 102539.
Dutta, P., Choi, T. M., Somani, S., et al. (2020). Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 142, 102067.
Fu, B., & Zhang, C. (2025). Selection of functional equivalence criteria for electronic bills oflading legislation in the context of shipping digitization. Journal of Hainan University(Social Sciences),1-10.
Liu, W. (2020). The application and legal regulation of block chain technology in shipping logistics industry. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, (2), 89–94.
Li, W., & Hu, Z. (2025). Systematic expression of legal regime on electronic transport records in the context of shipping digitalization: Comment on the legal regime in the draft revision of China’s Maritime Code. Hebei Law Science, 43(9), 143–162.
Li, J., Wang, Z., Guan, S., et al. (2024). ProChain: A privacy-preserving blockchain-based supply chain traceability system model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 187, 109831.
Nguyen, S., Chen, P. S. L., & Du, Y. (2022). Risk assessment of maritime container shipping blockchain-integrated systems: An analysis of multi-event scenarios. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 163, 102764.
Pang, Q., Cai, L., Wang, X., & Fang, M. (2024). Digital transformation as the fuel for sailing toward sustainable success: the roles of coordination mechanisms and social norms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 37(3), 1069-1096.
Pang, Q., Liu, X., & Su, M. (2025b). Leveraging Digital Intelligence Technologies for Green Shipping: Organization Information Processing and Contingency Perspective. Business strategy and the environment, 34(7), 9023-9039.
Pang, Q., Wang, M., Yao, J., & Fang, M. (2026). Employees’ perceived respect and performance in Logistics 4.0: a dyadic perspective of the congruence between employee voice and supervisor listening. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 56(2), 224-248.
Pang, Q., Zhang, M., Yuen, K. F., & Fang, M. (2025a). When the winds of change blow: an empirical investigation of ChatGPT’s usage behaviour. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 37(12), 3113-3127.
Shan, H., & Hu, X. (2024). Research on the Legal Obstacles and Countermeasures of Blockchain Empowering Chinese Shipping Industry. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics(Social Sciences Edition),1-12.
Yang, D. (2018). Supervising and regulating science and technology: Supervisory challenges and dimensional construction of financial technology. Social Sciences in China, (5), 69–91, 205–206.
Yao, J., Pang, Q., Fang, M., & Qiao, G. (2026). Dualistic perspectives of digital marketing strategies and sustainable performance of cultural heritage tourist sites: Based on qualitative and quantitative mixed methods. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 34(1), 187-212.
Zhang, L., & Miao, W. (2025). Easing regulatory dilemmas for the cross-border data flow of blockchain bills of lading: An analysis based on the “impossible triangle”. Intertrade, (8), 25–35.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Funding: This work is partially supported by the Annual Research Project for Social Organizations of Humanities and Social Sciences in Zhejiang Province (2026N117), Ningbo Philosophy and Social Sciences Laboratory Project and the Research Fund of Ningbo University of Finance & Economics (1320252023).
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jiayi Luo, Kaili Sun, Yuan Gao (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
