Research on the Impact of Corporate ESG on Promoting Common Prosperity—Empirical Evidence from Chinese A-share Listed Companies 2011-2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22854889Keywords:
ESG, Common Prosperity, Enterprise, Income Distribution, Financial PerformanceAbstract
Using data on Chinese A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2023, this paper examines the relationship between ESG and common prosperity at the firm level. From a theoretical perspective, corporate ESG activities can promote common prosperity through two channels: first, by improving corporate financial performance, that is, by "making the cake bigger"; and second, by optimizing the internal income distribution of enterprises, that is, by "dividing the cake well." The empirical analysis, based on a two-way fixed-effects model, yields the following results. ESG practices significantly enhance corporate financial performance, exerting significantly positive effects on return on equity, return on total assets, and operating profit, and the environmental dimension (E) has the strongest promoting effect on corporate growth. However, corporate ESG practices have not significantly optimized internal income distribution: they fail to increase the labor income share and, to some extent, even widen the pay gap between management and ordinary employees. These findings indicate that current ESG practices in Chinese enterprises play a positive role mainly in "making the cake bigger" but have not achieved the expected results in "dividing the cake well." To enable enterprises to better leverage ESG practices in contributing to common prosperity, policymakers should accelerate the improvement of ESG disclosure requirements and unified standards, strengthen ESG publicity and education, and promote the organic integration of the traditional concept of balancing righteousness and profit with ESG and common prosperity, so as to better respond to the theoretical and practical needs in related fields.
Downloads
References
Nie Huihua, Lin Jiani & Cui Mengying. ( 2022 ).ESG : A feasible way for enterprises to promote common prosperity. Learning and Exploration, ( 11 ), 107-116 + 2. [ 7 ] Alex
Kong, X., Jiang, F., & Zhu, L. (2022). Business strategy, corporate social responsibility, and within-firm pay gap. Economic modelling, 106, 105703.
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of corporate finance, 66, 101889.
[Wang Xiaohua, Han Xiaoyi & Wei Zhihua. ( 2025 ). ESG rating and enterprise labor factor allocation - also on the unity of efficiency and fairness. Financial Research, 51 ( 5 ), 50-64.https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20250220.302.
Zhang & Yuan ( 2024 ). Does ESG promote common prosperity within the enterprise ? - Based on the perspective of micro-enterprise labor income share. Journal of Dalian University for Nationalities, 26 ( 6 ), 535-544 + 576.https://doi.org/10.13744/j.cnki.cn21-1431/g4.20240718.001.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233.
Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of economic literature, 50(1), 51-84.
Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147-175.
L. S G ,Andrew K ,T. L S .Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2021,66DOI:10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2021.101889.
Li, T. T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663.
Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable finance: A review of the literature.
Yao, J., Pang, Q., Fang, M., & Qiao, G. (2026). Dualistic perspectives of digital marketing strategies and sustainable performance of cultural heritage tourist sites: Based on qualitative and quantitative mixed methods. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 34(1), 187-212.
Pang, Q., Cai, L., Wang, X., & Fang, M. (2024). Digital transformation as the fuel for sailing toward sustainable success: the roles of coordination mechanisms and social norms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 37(3), 1069-1096.
Pang, Q., Liu, X., & Su, M. (2025). Leveraging Digital Intelligence Technologies for Green Shipping: Organization Information Processing and Contingency Perspective. Business strategy and the environment, 34(7), 9023-9039.
Fang, M., Lim, M. K., Pang, Q., Xiao, S., & Shi, Y. (2026). Supplier digital technology-oriented open innovation and buyer social sustainability in supply chains: the role of director network structure. Production Planning & Control, 1-22.
Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286-300.
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global finance journal, 38, 45-64.
Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of cleaner production, 162, 1607-1616.
Lokuwaduge, C. S. D. S., & Heenetigala, K. (2017). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure for a sustainable development: An Australian study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 438-450.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 103(3), 351-383.
Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291.
Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of environmental management, 345, 118829.
Kong, X., Jiang, F., & Zhu, L. (2022). Business strategy, corporate social responsibility, and within-firm pay gap. Economic modelling, 106, 105703.
Di Giuli, A., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of financial economics, 111(1), 158-180.
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of banking & finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: where to now for environmental policy and practice?. Business strategy and the environment, 31(3), 1091-1110.
Yu, E. P. Y., Guo, C. Q., & Luu, B. V. (2018). Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 987-1004.
Huang, D. Z. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: A review and consolidation. Accounting & finance, 61(1), 335-360.
Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341.
Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635.
He, F., Guo, X., & Yue, P. (2024). Media coverage and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 103003.
Lee, K. H., Cin, B. C., & Lee, E. Y. (2016). Environmental responsibility and firm performance: The application of an environmental, social and governance model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(1), 40-53.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zhe Shen, Jinge Yao (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
